In a recent issue of
Script Magazine, “Mystery Man” wrote a long article called “The Case Against
Character Arcs.” He claims that it’s considered mandatory especially in
Hollywood that every protagonist have such an arc.
In case you’re not
familiar with the term, a character arc refers to the change the character
undergoes in the course of the story of a film or play or novel.
For instance,
Scrooge’s character arc takes him from greedy and self-centered to generous and
a loving member of his family.
Clint Eastwood’s latest film, “Gran Tornio,”
takes his character from being a suspicious, closed-off bigot to a man who has
opened up his heart.
However, not every
story has, or has to have, a protagonist who undergoes such a change. James
Bond doesn’t change much. Examples from the article include the killer (or the
others) in “No Country for Old Men,” `’Gandhi,” and “Butch Cassidy and the
Sundance Kid.”
So, yes, while we do
enjoy seeing people change (maybe it gives us hope that we, too, can change for
the better), it’s not mandatory.
It all depends on what
story you want to tell. I wrote a spec script not long ago in which a teen-ager
is the only one who really knows what is happening (bad things) but nobody
believes him. The story is about his determination to be heard, even when
telling the truth could destroy his father. Other than becoming a bit less
naïve than he is at the beginning, he doesn’t change much but I think the story
works.
Bottom line: if your
story doesn’t benefit from a character arc for your protagonist, don’t feel you
have to shoehorn one in.
(For information on how to develop characters and plot, see my book, "Your Writing Coach," published by Nicholas Brealey and available from Amazon and other online and offline retailers now.)