I was surprised to read the L.A. Times’ Jacket Copy column by Carolyn Kellogg about John Locke, the first self-published author to sell a million copies on Kindle. The headline is, “Independent author John Locke joins Amazon’s million-Kindle-seller club, but at what cost?”
She points out that Locke priced his novels at 99 cents and then writes, “What's significant in relation to Locke hitting the million-seller Kindle ebook mark is that it showcases that while choosing the Kindle Direct Publishing route removes agents and publishers from the equation, Locke makes less money with his 99-cent gambit than he would selling the same number of books with a traditional publisher.”
Yes, Ms Kellogg, but what’s even more significant is that it’s extremely doubtful that a million people would have been willing to buy this unknown’s books had they been priced like books from a traditional publisher. That’s true whether they were issued as paper books or as publisher's ebooks that usually sell for around $10. At 99 cents am I willing to take a chance on a new novelist? No problem. At $10 to $20? What do you think?
At what cost did Locke have his success? He made more than $350,000 in five months using his strategy. I’ll stick with his math over Ms. Kellogg’s any day.
(If you are interested in inexpensive ways to market your books or other products, get a copy of "Do Something Different," published by Virgin Books with a foreword by Sir Richard Branson. It includes 100 case studies you can adapt to your own marketing.)